"ECN", "Raw Spread", "Pro", "Standard" — every broker labels هەژمار differently. Strip the marketing and there are essentially two cost structures.

Standard هەژمار

  • Wider spread, no کۆمسیۆن.
  • Cost is bundled into the spread.
  • Simpler for نوێ traders to track.

ECN / Raw / Pro هەژمار

  • Tight raw spread, with explicit per-lot کۆمسیۆن.
  • Cost = (raw spread × pip value) + کۆمسیۆن round-turn.
  • Better for بەرز-frequency / scalping styles.
  • Often requires a higher minimum deposit.

Which is cheaper?

Compute the all-in cost. EUR/USD example: Standard هەژمار at 1.2 pip spread = ~$12 round-turn per lot. ECN at 0.1 pip spread + $7 round-turn کۆمسیۆن = $1 + $7 = ~$8 round-turn. Raw is cheaper here. On wider-spread instruments the gap can flip.

Which fits which trader?

  • بەرز-frequency scalpers / EA users → ECN almost always wins.
  • Swing traders making 5–15 trades a month → either works; Standard is operationally simpler.
  • Position traders holding for weeks → cost matters less than swap and reliability.

هەنگاوە دواترەکان on ShaFX